Tuesday, October 2, 2012
My Journey
2012 Parker Family Reunion - A Great Success
Monday, June 18, 2012
Parker Family Reunion
Friday, March 9, 2012
Jacob’s Ladder or stairway to heaven – As Jacob’s vision is opened, God beckons unto him to climb the stairway step by step. (Genesis 28:12-13, 22)
***************************
For many years, the Parker family tree has taken a diversion, due to inaccurate research done by many of our Parker cousins. We have been incorrectly linked to a Parker line from Massachusetts.
This Massachusetts family seemed close enough to us in dates and names – causing many of us to accept this line as our own. We have now discovered, through much effort on the part of dear cousins such as Robert Smith (Caleb Parker) in New Jersey, Suzanne Hansen (Daniel Parker) in Utah, Jerry Parker (Orson Hyde Parker), Debbie Hadden (Charles Henry Parker), and Gregory Parker (DNA testing), that documentation exists disproving this Massachusetts connection.
As we looked at the descendants of the Massachusetts family, Joshua Parker b. 1740, from Westford, Massachusetts, also had a son Joshua, b. 31 Dec. 1764, among his eight children. This Joshua married Hannah Jackman. They had 6 children, named Mary, Betsey, Levi, and Joshua (b. 1803), Abner, and John. He and his family moved to Cavendish, VT. He died and is buried there in Cavendish, 22 Dec. 1827.
The first Joshua, b. 1740 secondly married Hannah Kidder, and moved to Cavendish also. He died in Gouverneur, NY about 1831.
The grandson Joshua, (b. April 17, 1803) is also buried in Cavendish, VT. He was married to a Eunice Conant, and he died in Cavendish Aug. 22, 1879, at the age of 76.
(Book Excerpt (Parker Chapter) “Genes of Abraham” from Westford Public Library.)
This grandson, (Joshus Parker, b. 1803) – (if we follow this Massachusetts line correctly), would have to be our pioneer ancestor, Joshua Parker, b. 2 November, 1809, who married Drusilla Hartley Parker, and died in Salt Lake City, Utah, 17 July, 1880.
Clearly from Joshua’s own hand, we have the following:
“Joshua Parker, was born city of New York in the year 1809, embraced the gospel in the year Eighteen thirty eight Emigrated to Nauvoo in the year eighteen forty two lived In Illinois untill the church Broke up and then went to St. Louis remained there one year and five months and then came back up the Mississippi went to Bonaparte on the Desmoan River lived there untill the year forty nine.
And then a small company of us took up our line of march For council Bluffs iowa Arrived there all well Brother Hamilton Kearns and Family, Joshua Parker and family Brother Jacob degraw and family. Brother Dougherty and family And me and family I remained at Kainesville until the year fifty two and then took up the line of march Again for the valleys of the mountains with the Sixteenth Company of hundreds Arrived in Salt Lake City October 9th, where I have remained until the present Time Eighteen Sixty eight with my family J Parker” (Copied exactly as written)
Our grandfather Joshua Parker, b. 1809, has stated that his parents were Joshua Parker and Sarah Rogers. They were married in the Reformed Dutch Church of New York City, on June 30, 1802.
From the New York City directories and Death Registry, we learn that Joshua Parker, (b. 1778) died at age 41, Sept 27, 1819. In the New York City death registry, Joshua’s (b. 1778) place of “nativity” or birth, is listed as “Cortlandt Manor, SNY.” He was living on Greenwich St. in Manhatten at the time of his death. A year later, Sarah, his wife, is listed in the city directory of 1820, (and is listed as a “widow”), living at 29 Charlton St., New York City.
New York City, and the small cities north near Cortlandt Manor/Tarrytown etc on the banks of the Hudson River, have revealed many more clarifications to our Parker roots in New York.
ore to come!
Melanie Dewsnup (descendant of Frederick Albion Parker, son of Joshua Parker (b. 1809)
Friday, February 17, 2012
Joshua born 1778
Helen Keller once said, “A man can't make a place for himself in the sun if he keeps taking refuge under the family tree.”
Many of us have deeply desired to discover more about our Parker family our roots. But are we all climbing the right tree? The work goes much faster as we all connect and share information. That means we all get out into and enjoy the sunshine together. To this end, several of the Parker cousins thought it would be nice to form an organization that would keep us all up to date with all that is going on. And it fascinating and inspiring all the things that being discovered and verified.
So this blog was created to attempt to help us all as Parker Dependents climb the right Tree. the concern of one family member," I too have tried to untangle the new.familysearch.org mess. Several months ago, I began trying to separate combined records showing incorrect parentage for Joshua 1809 and Joshua 1778. After many, many, many hours separating combined records, I called the FamilySearch help-line and basically was told they could do nothing considering the amount of combined records. My main problem was that several records listed more than one set of parents, but were also linked to Druscilla or Sarah.
Some had both Joshua's being their own fathers, or showing Sarah as both wife and mother to the same person. Any attempt to separate that records only made more confusion, because the separation would 'create' another person to whom the spouse would be married to since the records contain other relationships. Their best suggestion was to contact anyone who had submitted a line with incorrect parents or other information instructing them to correct it. They were unable to do anything else and said they must consider each submission valid.
"I don't know if this is helpful to anyone, but I wondered if it might apply to our Joshua Parker (1778) who is sometimes referred to as a "junior"......... Apparently in colonial and early American times, the titles of Jr and Sr didn't necessarily mean a familial relationship. It could simply mean two people with the same name in the same area were being distinguished from one another using the titles in reference to their ages, the older being called Sr, and the younger, Jr. I came across this situation while researching a line in Virginia, and found these titles very confusing in a particular situation. A researcher more familiar with the area and time period than I pointed that out to me. So, my question is, where do we get that Joshua is a Jr? Is there anything on his father's first name? Does this change anything if we said his father was not a Joshua? Are their other familial possibilities? I'd love to hear any other insights on this!"
Parker Family research specialist Mr Smith replied to her question...
I don't know if this is helpful to anyone, but I wondered if it might apply to our Joshua Parker (1778) who is sometimes referred to as a "junior"......... Apparently in colonial and early American times, the titles of Jr and Sr didn't necessarily mean a familial relationship. It could simply mean two people with the same name in the same area were being distinguished from one another using the titles in reference to their ages, the older being called Sr, and the younger, Jr. I came across this situation while researching a line in Virginia, and found these titles very confusing in a particular situation. A researcher more familiar with the area and time period than I pointed that out to me. So, my question is, where do we get that Joshua is a Jr? Is there anything on his father's first name? Does this change anything if we said his father was not a Joshua? Are their other familial possibilities? I'd love to hear any other insights on this!
That question has puzzled everyone that has ever worked on the early Parker family. Jerry said he forwarded or attached two PDF books to his e-mail. Open the one titled “Joshua Parker a Family Chronology”. I asked that same question in the late 1990s, In 2005 when I was researching and writing the above thirty eight page booklet.
It appears on page eight (8). I also answered the question. The answer is a strong maybe or probably! There has never been a ‘negative’ response to Joshua born 1778, being a Junior. But would there ever be? There is no evidence that I’m not a junior either or that Jerry is not a junior. Until the father of Joshua born 1778 has been positively identified by some other sources, the information on page 8 is all we have to go on.
As to your thought that maybe it didn’t denote Father and Son but “Older and Younger” Well there were only two Joshua’s in NYC in 1810 (actually throughout all the early 1800s).
Joshua a Shoemaker (ours)
Joshua a Tailor (older than our Joshua)
Now, I did track these two Parkers and although they did move around in Lower Manhattan from 1802 through 1811. The shoemaker was mainly on the ‘Westside’ of NYC and the Tailor was mainly on the ‘Eastside’ of NYC (near city hall and where the Brooklyn Bridge would be built). I found nothing in common between them. If they had lived in the same neighborhood then maybe… but I doubt it.
Familial possibilities??? The oldest son is Daniel (I think). Joshua is in the middle son , and Talmadge was the youngest, followed by two daughters. Now, Joshua born 1778 named his oldest son Moses. Could this be after a father or grandfather??? Possibly, but Moses wasn’t used again in our Parker family. So I doubt it. I suspect that the father of Joshua born 1778 (that most people would call Joshua Sr.) was the immigrant Parker coming from Northern Ireland sometime in the middle 1700s. It would be, or is hard to predict a familial naming without knowing the family in Northern Ireland. Any thoughts or questions gladly accepted. Regards Bob